I get asked this all the time:
"G, why did you become a librarian?"
First off, no one becomes anything. You choose to do things. There's no sudden transformation from "human being" to "librarian", although I understand how people might think there is.
Anyway, here's the story:
(a) I was 19 and had no idea what I wanted to do, so I picked an easy media arts major at [University] because it looked like fun.
(b) Finished near the top, but was getting concerned about the rumours that people with media arts degrees don't get jobs.
(c) Worked in the tech sector for a while, then quit to go back to school, after realizing that people with media arts degrees indeed do not get jobs. At least, not of the "pays the loans and has a future" variety.
(d) Picked Library and Information Sciences because it was the only professional degree for which I had an appropriate background. That and I personally knew over half the selection committee at [University]. Never underestimate the importance of networking, at any juncture, at any time. You just never know when it's going to pay off.
(e) Finished near the top, then realized that people with MLIS degrees also do not get jobs because no one wants to pay the going rate for a professional degree.
(f) Did some short-term library contracts, but found that Tech work with a MLIS degree is both bogus and sad.
(g) Got out of the field altogether and into the corporate world, which actually made use of my background in a job that I could have done out of high school. The job was amazing, the company was great, my future growth looked good, but the immediate contract renewal (specifically the $$$) did not. Made a tough call and left for greener pastures. Damned student loans.
(h) Got hired by [Library], in a rare capacity requiring, and paying the going rate for, the MLIS degree, for a job I could have done out of high school.
(i) I have yet to use anything learned in the MLIS program within any librarian capacity, including former library contracts. In other words, the piece of paper opened the door, but has been collecting dust since.
Do I love what I do? Some days, yeah, especially when I get to treat stupid people the way they should be treated: as stupid people. Those days are fun.
But most days, I only like what I do (very big difference) ... namely because there's simply far too much petty BS that goes on around libraries. Way too clique-y for my tastes. And no one is under the gun. No one gets fired. Which means nobody is productive, because there is no substantial - or potential - threat of action against them for sitting on their collective asses.
[I FEEL A BONUS RANT COMING ON ...]
I miss the corporate world, so much, if for no other reason than people are fired on a regular basis for not performing at the rate they are being paid to perform. The figurative gun is always pressed against the back of your skull, and if you don't live up to your hype, you're gone. Productivity is buoyed by fear; it always has been and it always will be.
But in public libraries there is zero productivity, zero efficiency, and zero initiative to develop new services and improve existing standards. Nobody cares, because no one is going to do anything to them if they sit on their hands.
Seriously, I could do lines of coke off my desk, right in front of the Big Boss, and you know what would happen? I'd be put in a six-week rehab program and my job would be waiting for me when I got back. That's complete and utter BS, but that's the way it is when the library does not want to have to explain to its taxpayer patrons why their money is paying the salary (severance) of someone who no longer works there.
In the corporate world, this isn't an issue because shareholders are interested in the productivity of the company, and a firing usually indicates that productivity is about to skyrocket due to (a) the replacement hire and (b) the fear factor among the rest of the employees. Productivity = profit in the private sector; in the public sector it equals progressive service development. In other words, tangible versus intangible changes. Take a guess which of the two the public gives a rip about: the one that pays out, or the one that makes their lives more efficient for the fifteen minutes they're using the service?
If you picked the intangible (service development), smack yourself upside the head for me, will you?
Until libraries start running more as a business, and measuring profit in terms of service efficiency, usage increases, and feedback on new service developments (not to mention firing people), staff lethargy will continue its alarming rate of growth and no progression will occur within the field. And do you know the result of nothing? Irrelevance. In other words, libraries will die, and the field eventually will disappear, all because a bunch of managers didn't want to hurt anyone's feelings by actually doing their jobs and ensuring the highest levels of productivity.
So here I am, liking this field but not certainly not loving it (at least, not all of it), for all those reasons mentioned above. The freedom to be an asshole without reprimand is really the only thing keeping me around - even I admit there are some benefits to the inability to get fired - that, and the knowledge that I'd have a hard time matching the pay anywhere else.
Yes, a part of it does come down to money; we all have bills to pay and I'm no exception to that. However, I am unashamed to admit that I am grossly overpaid for what I do at [Library] ... as are most professional-category librarians out there. But at least some of us care about the future of the profession and keep actively butting our heads against the Great Wall of Indifference. What else are we going to do? Nothing? Hey, the ship may be sinking, but this kid's not going down without a fight.
Because at the end of the day, you've got to either shit or get off the pot. And sitting on your hands all day counting the members of your clique is better suited to filling in the time in the Unemployment line, than it is to a an organization with an active interest in its own long-term growth and viability.
If only the powers-that-be in the public sector understood that, and were willing do something about it to ensure the future relevance of our services. It's a damn shame.